What are the top 5 applicant tracking systems for remote workers?

Part
01
of one
Part
01

What are the top 5 applicant tracking systems for remote workers?

Hello! Thanks for your request to identify the top 5 applicant tracking systems for remote workers. The short version is that the top 5 applicant tracking systems for recruiting/evaluating remote workers are Lever, Crelate, Breezy, Workable, and Greenhouse. Below you will find a deep dive of my findings.

METHODOLOGY

To identify the top 5 applicant tracking systems for remote workers, I first examined articles that talked about the best applicant tracking systems specifically for recruiting/evaluating remote workers. Work Remotely had identified 6 applicant tracking systems that would assist companies with growing remote teams while HubSpot had identified 17 tools for finding and interviewing remote candidates, including 9 applicant tracking systems. Both articles had identified Lever, which is also rated highly on Capterra, a business software user-reviews website. To select the 4 other applicant tracking systems, I utilized Capterra again and selectde the tools mentioned in the 2 articles that have been rated the highest and had the most number of reviews.

LEVER

Lever Hire combines the functionally of ATS and CRM in one platform to allow users to source, nurture, and manage their candidates in one place. Its features include “customizable job site creation, one-click sourcing, referral links to track applicants’ inbound path, and two-way email sync.” It is recommended for companies looking for a solution that is capable of managing the entire hiring process.
Rating: 4.5 (82 reviews)
Pricing: Interested customers have to contact Lever for a quote but the plans usually cost between $300 and $3,000.

CRELATE

Crelate was created specifically for executive search firms. Besides offering the typical applicant tracking systems functions, it also allows users to “mine through data fields including resume, internal notes, recent activity, and email communication.” It offers more features for premium plans.
Rating: 5.0 (106 reviews)
Pricing:
Essentials - $55 per user/month (Annual plan)
Professional - $69 per user/month (Annual plan)
Business Premium - $89 per user/month (Annual plan)

BREEZY

Breezy offers features such as candidate management, candidate sourcing, and reporting and analytics. It also has a special customization feature that allows users to “drag and drop editor to create exactly the workflow” in their hiring process. Users could also post and promote new jobs on multiple platforms, including social media platforms.
Rating: 4.5 (433 reviews)
Uno - Free for 1 active position
Starter - $49 per month for 3 active positions
Growth - $149 per month for 10 active positions
Pro - Custom quote for more than 10 active positions

WORKABLE

Workable’s applicant tracking system streamlines tasks such as resume reviewing and candidate management by keeping every information and tool on one platform. Other key features that it offers include creating a career site, finding qualified candidates, conducting interviews, and hiring analytics. The entire hiring process could be completed on one platform, “without the need for any data entry or synchronization between platforms.”
Rating: 4.5 (198 reviews)
Pricing: Workable does not display its pricing on its website, but the basic plan is believed to cost $19 per month.

GREENHOUSE

Greenhouse started as a recruiting platform but had evolved into a complete applicant tracking system. It offers features for the planning, sourcing, interviewing, and hiring stages. It also has a built-in A/B testing to “measure which job postings are getting the most, and highest quality, applicants."
Rating: 4.5 (196 reviews)
Pricing: Greenhouse does not display its pricing on its website. It offers Core, Pro, and Enterprise plans.

CONCLUSION

To wrap it up, the top 5 applicant tracking systems for recruiting/evaluating remote workers are Lever, Crelate, Breezy, Workable, and Greenhouse. Thanks for using Wonder! Please let us know if we can help with anything else!

Did this report spark your curiosity?

Sources
Sources