Who were the most ruthless British monarchs throughout history?

Part
01
of four
Part
01

Who were the most prominent royal families other than the Windsors?

Key Takeaways

  • According to sources such as the English Heritage, the Tudors are possibly the most famous royal family in English history. The Royal Family's website also describes the five monarchs of the Tudor dynasty as some of the most well-known figures in Royal history.
  • The Stuarts were the first kings of the United Kingdom whose reign lasted from 1603 to 1714. Before ruling England, the Stuarts ruled Scotland for a very long time. However, because Queen Elizabeth I never married or had any children, when she died, her closest royal relative, King James VI of Scotland, succeeded her and became King James I of England. King James I's ascension united the two long-warring nations and signified the beginning of one of the most important eras in forming modern British society.
  • King Henry VIII and his daughter Queen Elizabeth I are among the most famous monarchs from the Tudor dynasty to ever sit on the English throne while King James I and King Charles II are some of England’s most popular & beloved kings from the Stuart dynasty.

Introduction

The Kings and Queens of England can be traced far back to 871, when Celtic and Belgic tribesmen started settling in Britain. This report provides insights into the Tudor and Stuart dynasties, which are some of the most prominent British royal families other than the Windsors.

The Tudors

  • According to sources such as the English Heritage, the Tudors are possibly the most famous royal family in English history. The Royal website also describes the five monarchs of the Tudor dynasty as some of the most well-known figures in Royal History.
  • King Henry VIII and his daughter Queen Elizabeth I are among the most famous monarchs from the Tudor dynasty to ever sit on the English throne.
  • King Henry VIII succeeded the throne at 17 years old after the death of his father, Henry VII. He was also allowed to marry his late brother’s wife, Catherine of Aragon, after the pope gave a special dispensation. The young king’s rule lasted from 1509 to 1547.
  • Queen Elizabeth I (also known as the Virgin Queen) is considered to be the greatest English monarch by many according to the English History. She ruled from 1558 to 1603 after her half-sister Queen Mary I, who took over from their father, died.
  • The Tudor period is one of the most exciting eras in English History as they introduced many changes. Under Tudors, the church of England was formed to cancel out the power of the Catholic church after king Henry VIII’s request to annul his marriage with Catherine was denied. This brought about the martyrdom of many Catholics and Protestants during the Tudor era. The growth of the English Renaissance, the defeat of the Spanish Armada, and England becoming one of the leading European colonial powers are also some of the major events that shaped this era.
  • The creation of the Royal Mail (the first national postal service), growth of the Royal Navy, defeat of the Spanish Armada, and blossoming of the Royal Exchange (the first purpose-built center for trading stocks in London) are some of the great achievements of the Tudors that shaped modern Britain.
  • However, the messy separation from the Catholic church and persecution of the people who opposed it during king Henry VIII’s reign and later on the killing of protestants who refused to convert back to Catholicism when Queen Mary I tried to reconcile with Rome goes down in history books as one of the major failures of the Tudor dynasty.
  • One interesting fact about the Tudor monarchs and aristocrats is that they inherited mottos, which could change to reflect important occasions, that would be placed alongside their personal symbols on their servants’ uniforms. Some of the mottos had a quite modern feel. For instance, during the Christmas period in 1530, in reference to her intention to marry King Henry VIII, Anne Boleyn used the motto ‘Ainsi sera, groigne qui groigne’ which translates to more or less ‘Haters gonna hate’.

The Stuarts

Research Strategy

For this research on the most prominent royal families other than the Windsors, we leveraged the most reputable sources of information that were available in the public domain, including the Royal website, English Heritage, and BBC, among others.
Part
02
of four
Part
02

Who were the most ruthless British monarchs throughout history?

Key Takeaways

Introduction

Henry VIII, King John, William the Conqueror, Mary Queen of Scots, and Edward II are five of the most ruthless British monarchs in history. Their reigns were tyrannical and cruel, costing thousands of lives.

Henry VIII — 1509-1547

  • Writers from the Historical Writers Association were polled as to who they believed to be the worst monarch in British history, 20% agreed that Henry VIII took the top spot.
  • Ruling from 1509 to 1547, Henry VIII was the second monarch in the Tudor dynasty. Henry VIII is well-known for his marriages, and how he handled each of his wives.
  • Determined to have a male heir, he annulled his marriage to his first wife after she only produced a daughter. Of his six wives, two were beheaded, two were divorced, one died during childbirth, and his final wife outlived him.
  • The King was so determined to divorce his fourth wife that he separated from the Catholic church and named himself the head of the Church of England. Any opponents to the revolution were executed, it is alleged that during his reign he had hundreds of people executed.
  • During his reign, Henry VIII increased the size of the Royal Navy by ten times. He was the first British monarch to set up a defense for the island, creating dockyards at Deptford, Woolwich and Portsmouth.
  • In 1518, the King turned his attention to the medical profession, and established what would become the Royal College of Physicians. Licenses were granted, and standards were put in place for malpractice.

King John — 1199-1216

William the Conqueror — 1066-1087

  • William the Conqueror reigned from 1066 to 1087, the first king of the house of Normandy dynasty. He claimed the English throne by asserting that his distant cousin, Edward the Confessor had promised the throne to him.
  • His reign began by the defeat and killing of his rival to the throne, Harold Godwinson, at the Battle of Hastings. The battle costs the lives of thousands.
  • In 1069, the Danes and other English nobles invaded the North of England, and took York. To drive them out, William devastated Mercia and Northumbria. Churches were burnt to the ground, and agricultural land was destroyed so badly that nine years of famine lasted for the area's peasant population.
  • William ordered the Domesday survey, and resulting in the two volumes of the Domesday Book in 1086. The survey was a comprehensive record of all the landowners, property, tenants, and serfs of England. The book is seen as one of his most successful achievements.

Queen Mary I - 1516-1558

Edward II — 1307-1327

Research Strategy

For this research on five of the most ruthless monarchs in British history we relied on pre-compiled lists, and multiple article mentions. Sources used include the Sunday Post, History Extra, The Guardian, History Hit, and Prospect Magazine.



Part
03
of four
Part
03

Could the story of King Arthur be based on a real person?

Key Takeaways

  • The first written account that mentions King Arthur is believed to have been composed by a Welsh monk from the 6th century known as Gildas. Approximately 200 years later, King Arthur appeared again in a series of works known as the History of the Britons written by a 9th century historian called Nennius and some scholars point to this work as evidence he was real.
  • According to Historic UK, the most famous depiction of King Arthur’s legend is The History of the Kings of Britain (Historia Regum Britanniae) written by a Celtic cleric known as Geoffrey of Monmouth.
  • While some scholars point to Gildas and Nennius’ works as evidence that King Arthur existed, others such as a retired medievalist at the University of Manchester and the author of 2018’s King Arthur: The Making of the Legend, Nicholas Higham, state that the evidence in those texts is hardly conclusive.

Introduction

The tales of King Arthur, also known as “the king that was and the king that shall be” have spread far and wide and while many people believe he was a real person, there’s no evidence to confirm that he existed. This report provides an overview of two arguments that are used to defend the hypothesis that King Arthur was a real person and two that are used against it. We've also provided an example of how the tale of King Arthur was historically used to gain political advantage.

Arguments Supporting the Hypothesis

    Gildas and Nennius Works from the 6th and 9th Centuries

  • The first written account that mentions King Arthur is believed to have been composed by a Welsh monk from the 6th century known as Gildas. In his work, Gildas talks about the Roman conquest of Britain, stating that a Roman-British leader called Ambrosius Aurelianus (believed to be King Arthur) won a series of battles against Saxons at places such as the Badon Hill. According to the Smithsonian, while Gildas only mentioned the battle, other works such as the eighth-century Ecclesiastical History of the English People describe the battle in detail, convincing scholars that it happened.
  • Approximately 200 years later after appearing in Gildas's work, King Arthur appeared again in a series of works known as the History of the Britons written by a 9th century historian called Nennius and some scholars point to this work as evidence that King Arthur was real.
  • The History of the Britons stated that a warrior known as Arthur won 12 battles over Saxons, with the twelfth one being at the Hill of Badon. Nennius, who did not refer to Arthur as a king, claimed that he single-handedly killed approximately 900 Saxons at the battle of Badon.

    History of the Kings of Britain by Geoffrey of Monmouth

Arguments Against the Hypothesis

    Critique of Gildas and Nennius Works

  • While some scholars point to Gildas and Nennius’ works as evidence that King Arthur existed, others such as a retired medievalist at the University of Manchester and the author of 2018’s King Arthur: The Making of the Legend, Nicholas Higham, state that the evidence in those texts is hardly conclusive. For instance, the text was written 300 years after the supposed Battle of Badon Hill.
  • Additionally, historians in the Middle Ages are “widely known to have blended fact and fiction to advance a political or religious agenda,” and when the Saxons were conquering Britain, Britons needed a god-beloved warrior to lift their spirits and encourage them. Thus, Nennius came up with King Arthur's character to help the situation, according to Higham.

    Critique of Geoffrey of Monmouth's Text

  • According to Marc Morris, a British historian and author of 2021’s The Anglo Saxons: A History of the Beginnings of England: 400 to 1066, just like Nennius, Geoffrey also had a political agenda that made him write his Arthurian tale. Morris claims that possibly born in Wales, Geoffrey wanted to “show the superiority of the Celtic-speaking Britons, and by extension, the Welsh, who spoke the same language” because the Welsh were thought of as savages and barbarians. He invented a noble history for them, making King Arthur a Celtic-speaking warrior-king.
  • Moreover, Geoffrey said that he got “details of Arthur’s life from an ancient Welsh history book shown to him by an Oxford archdeacon” but there is no proof that the book existed.
  • In addition, experts in Celtic dismiss the significance of the mysterious word “Artognou” carved into the slab that was found.

King Arthur's Tale Used to Gain Political Advantage

  • According to the Smithsonian, whether or not King Arthur was real, he remained a source of legitimacy for Britain's rulers, as he had from the very beginning. For example, the Tudors used his tale as a propaganda tool during their reign.
  • The Tudors claimed they were direct descendants of King Arthur and one of their monarchs, King Henry VII, even baptized his son Prince Arthur. The king knew his claim to the throne was shaky and decided to claim King Arthur as his ancestor to strengthen his position. According to the Special Broadcasting Service, King Henry went as far as to have “royal genealogists trace his lineage back to Camelot.”

Research Strategy

For this research on whether the story of King Arthur is based on a real person, we leveraged the most reputable sources of information that were available in the public domain, including the Smithsonian, History Extra, and Historic UK, among others.
Please note that because of the historical nature of the request, we referenced slightly dated sources to provide the requested information.
Part
04
of four
Part
04

How did House Windsor come to rule the British Empire?

Key Takeaways

  • The House of Hanover began reigning over England after the death of Queen Anne of the Stuart Dynasty in 1714.
  • Queen Victoria's marriage to Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha in 1840 marked the entrance of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha into the royal family.
  • In 1901, Edward VII, son of Queen Victoria, became the first king of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. After he died in 1910, his second son, George V, became the King of England. George V, during his reign, changed his house's name from the German Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to the more English Windsor.

Introduction

This report provides an overview of the evolution of the British Monarchy, focusing on the transition from the reign of the House of Hanover to the reign of the House of Windsor.

The Reign of the House of Hanover

  • The House of Hanover began reigning over England after Queen Anne of the Stuart Dynasty, who did not bear any children, died in 1714. King George I, the first king of the House of Hanover, assumed the position by the 1701 Act of Settlement. Prior to this, the King was the 52nd in line to the throne, while the House of Hanover was simply the Stuart dynasty's German Protestant cousins.
  • There were six British monarchs from the House of Hanover, reigning from 1714 to 1901.
  • King George Lewis (George I) began his reign at the age of 54 from 1714-1727. He was an unpopular King, and unsuccessful attempts were made to depose him and replace him with the Catholic James Francis Edward Stuart, also known as the Old Pretender. When King George died of a stroke in Osnabrück, he was buried in his hometown, Hanover, making him the last "British monarch to be buried outside of Britain."
  • King George II, son of King George I, ascended the throne after the death of his father in 1727. The relationship between the two was fractious and estranged, as George I had imprisoned his wife and George II's mother, Sophia Dorothea of Celle. George I was also said to have, at some point, prevented George II and his wife from seeing their children. George II was known to publicly oppose his father's policies.
  • King George III succeeded his grandfather, George II, after his death in 1760. He was the first Hanover King to be born in Britain. He became the heir after the death of his father, Prince Frederick, in 1751. Although a popular king, George III lived his final years "neglected and unkempt, a blind and deaf octogenarian." He died after "another violent attack of porphyria" and was buried in 1820.
  • King George IV, son of George III, ascended the throne in 1820. While a prince, he was known to amass debts and live a wild and extravagant life. To induce the English Parliament to pay his £600,000 debt, he was forced to marry his cousin, Caroline of Brunswick. He died in 1830 with multiple conditions, including gout, arteriosclerosis, addiction to laudanum, obesity, peripheral edema, and possibly porphyria.

How the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha Became the Royal Family

  • Victoria became Queen at age 18 after her uncle, William IV, died without any children from his legitimate marriage to Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen. She was married shortly after her ascension.
  • Queen Victoria's marriage to Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha marked the entrance of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha into the royal family. The couple was married on the 10th of May 1840.
  • Although their marriage is said to have had a rocky start, the Queen eventually became devoted to her husband. They both led exemplary lives that helped regain respect for the crown.
  • The marriage produced King Edward VII, who reigned as the first King of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha from 1901 to 1910.

The Reign of Edward VII of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha

House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha Becomes the House of Windsor

  • In 1917, during the First World War, King George V changed his house's name from the German Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to the more English Windsor. The change was due to Germany's tyranny at the time and its effect on Great Britain. The general sentiment in the country was anti-German, and the royal house "felt a need to distance" themselves from Germany.
  • During George V's reign, women were allowed to vote for the first time, and he launched the annual Royal Christmas Speech in 1932.

Research Strategy

In compiling this report, the research team utilized reputable historical sources such as EnglishMonarchs and Project Britain. Due to the nature of the request, we leveraged some dated sources to provide a broader historical context.

Did this report spark your curiosity?

Sources
Sources

From Part 02
From Part 04