After an extensive search through company databases, press releases, company reports, and media articles, details about Kimberly Clark's true competitors do not appear to be available in the public domain. However, the research team was able to identify close competitors to Kimberly Clark, which are P&G, Unilever, and Edgewell Personal Care. More information regarding these companies is provided below.
Kimberly Clark Product & Size
- The Company operates in three major operating segments, which are personal care, consumer tissues, and K-C professional.
- Under the 'Personal Care' segment the company offers a wide variety of products such as disposable diapers, training and youth pants, swimpants, baby wipes, feminine and incontinence care products, and other related products which are sold under the brands Huggies, Pull-Ups, Little Swimmers, GoodNites, DryNites, Kotex, U by Kotex, Intimus, Depend, Plenitud, Poise, and others.
- Products in the 'Consumer Tissues' segment include tissue, paper towels, and napkins, and are sold under the brands Kleenex, Scott, Cottonelle, Viva, Andrex, Scottex, and Neve, among others.
- 'K-C Professional' category provides supporting products such as wipers, tissue, towels, apparel, soaps and sanitizers under brands such as Kleenex, Scott, WypAll, Kimtech, and KleenGuard, among others.
- Based on the various company databases such as Hoovers, Zoom Info, Craft.co, etc., some close competitors of the Company include Unilever, P&G, Edgewell Personal Care Company, Georgia-Pacific, Clorox and Krugar Products.
- The Company had net consolidated sales of $18.5 billion in 2018 and approximately 41,000 employees as of December 31, 2018.
Close Competitors
P&G
Website
- The company's website can be accessed here.
Why It is a Close Competitor and Not a True Competitor?
- P&G, similar to Kimberly Clark, offers adult and feminine care products as well as family care products, such as paper towels, tissues, toilet Paper, etc. under various brands like 'Always', 'Always Discreet', 'Tampax', 'Bounty', 'Charmin', and 'Puffs'.
- The company, like Kimberly Clark, is one of the most sought after brands in these categories and enjoys 25% share of the global feminine care market. The US market shares for family care products are 40% for 'Bounty' and 25% for
'Charmin' brands.
- In terms of size, however, the company is much bigger than Kimberly Clark and had $67.7 billion in net sales and approximately 97,000 employees in FY19. 'Baby, Feminine & Family Care' segment alone represented 27% of the company sales of $18.3 billion.
Value Proposition
- The company provides value to consumers through its range of quality products, its customer service, and its reputation as a reliable manufacturer.
- P&G provides products that cater to all customer segments, including some of the world’s most popular and respected consumer brands.
- Its broad range of high quality products and its reliable supply chain and distribution operations also create value for its retail and distribution customers in the form of revenue and sales.
Unilever
Website
- The company's website can be accessed here.
Why It is a Close Competitor and Not a True Competitor
- The company operates in a range of beauty and personal care as well as home care products closely in line with Kimberly Clark. It offers feminine and adult facial and personal care products under brands such as 'Fair & Lovely', 'Axe', 'Rexona', 'Alberto Balsam', etc., and home care products under brands like 'Rin', 'Vixel', 'Wheel', etc.
- The Company however does not have any major competing brands in feminine & adult sanitary care, including incontinence like Kimberly Clark. It also does not have a strong foothold in any paper products.
- In terms of size, the company is much bigger than Kimberly Clark as it had $57.7 billion in net sales and it has approximately 154,848 employees.
Value Proposition
- Unilever’s most important value proposition is its ability to provide quality goods at reasonable prices. Its scale allows it to produce goods at relatively lower cost while maintaining quality.
- Unilever owns a significant number of brands, each with its own unique value proposition. For example, Magnum is known for providing quality ice-cream at premium, while Knorr is known for providing household items, such as stock cubes and sauces, at very inexpensive prices.
- The company's ability to have access to niche markets, particularly in developing countries, adds on to its value proposition by making its products omnipresent globally. This coverage gives Unilever a strong branding, driving sales.
Edgewell Personal Care
Website
- The company's website can be accessed here.
Why It is a Close Competitor and Not a True Competitor
- The company closely competes with Kimberly Clark in feminine care brands such as 'Carefree', 'Playtex', 'Stayfree' and 'o.b brands'. It offers tampons and market pads and liners and is one of the top three manufacturers of feminine care products in North America. Thus, the Company acts as a strong competitor to Kimberly in this product line.
- Edgewell Personal Care, however, does not operate in the paper products (bath, towels, facial) category as it has no offering in that segment, whereas Kimberly is an extremely potential player in that category.
- In terms of size, this company is much smaller in scale than Kimberly, with revenues of just $2.2 billion in 2018 and approximately 5,900 employees.
Value Proposition
- The company has several strong brands in growing categories and enjoys a unique "Challenger" position. In addition, it has a diverse geographic footprint and a culture dedicated to innovation, productivity, and value creation.
- It has a history of strong profit growth and cash flow generation and a history of successful M&A which adds on to its value proposition.
- Edgewell Personal Care
's value proposition is further accentuated by the ongoing value drivers that it leverages, such as accelerate top line growth, systematic cost reduction, substantial free cash flow generation, and disciplined approach to acquisitions.
Research Strategy:
We were unable to provide true competitors which are similar in size and product offerings. All the close competitors identified who deal in the same product categories as Kimberly Clark are much bigger in size and operations or the ones which are somewhat close in size (revenue/number of employees) do not deal in all the Kimberly product categories.
In order to find Kimberly Clark's true competitors, our first strategy was to initiate a search through various credible company databases, such as Zoom Info, Craft.Io, Hoovers, Crunchbase, and Manta, after studying the business model and product offerings of Kimberly Clark.
These databases are the most potential source where any pre-compiled list of competitors is present for any company. We were able to locate a list of competitors for the company through these databases, including P&G, Unilever, Edgewell Personal Care Company, Georgia-Pacific, Clorox, and Krugar Products, among others. However, on comparing the size of these in terms of revenues or number of employees none of them was in close ball park of Kimberly. Some players, like P&G and Unilever, were found to be much bigger in
size, while those like Krugar and Edgewell were much smaller. Also, apart from P&G, there was no other company found that operated in both adult & feminine care (including incontinence) and paper (bath, towels, facial) products in tune of the scale of Kimberly. As this strategy resulted in identifying few close competitors of Kimberly, it did not reveal any true competitors.
Our second strategy was to hunt through the company's website, press releases, annual reports, presentations, earnings call transcripts, management commentary, and management interviews. All these are potential sources where any company provides insights into its competition especially in annual reports and, at times, discloses the players it considers its direct competitors. Hence, we decided to follow this path and see if Kimberly had disclosed any direct competitors which we could use as a proxy for true competitors. While the company did mention that it faces competition from several established brands as well as private label players in its annual report, it does not directly mention or identify the names of any of its competitors. Also, it does not provide any direct comparison with competitors in earning call transcripts. Hence, this strategy failed to yield desired results.
Our third strategy was to scour through the industry level reports for the key product segments of Kimberly from sources like Deloitte, Mckinsey, Statista, Nielsen, Business Insider, etc. Such reports are an extremely potential source of key players operating in any industry and our aim was to identify key players in the "Paper Products" and "Adult & Feminine Care" industries which are the major operating segments of Kimberly and then triangulate the list of true competitors from the same. While we were able to find relevant reports for these segments, the other major players mentioned in these were again similar to the found above. These included P&G, Unilever, Georgia-Pacific, and Edgewell Personal Care Company. Couple of new names like PayChest Inc. and Thinx Inc were also found through the reports, but again none of these had the similar products or size like that of Kimberly. For example Paychest Inc. has $6.1 million in revenues as compared to Kimberly's $18 billion and does not offer any adult or feminine care products. Thus, no true competitors could be identified through this strategy as well.
Our fourth strategy was to hunt through the media articles from Forbes, WSJ, Business Insider, Live Mint, Bloomberg, Reuters, Capital IQ, etc., along with various feminine and adult care blogs such as 'Menstrupedia', 'Honey Pot', 'Represh', 'Healthline', etc. These are again potential sources where various company profiles belonging to a sector/industry are discussed and our idea was to identify any players through these sources which are true competitors of Kimberly. However, no pertinent information could be located through these sources. All the information found discussed the profiles of close competitors mentioned above, like Unilever and P&G, along with the information on the top brands offered by these companies in feminine and adult care as well as paper products.
Our last strategy was to hunt through third party broker/analyst reports, especially the initiating coverage reports on Kimberly, as it is a public company.
These reports are an extremely potential source where brokers undertake relative valuation of the companies that they track. Such valuation entails comparison of the company valuations with that of competitors. Our idea was to leverage these reports in order to identify any true competitors of the company. While we were able to locate the analyst coverage for the company, most of the reports were behind pay walls and the public information available was centered around the price targets, buy/sell recommendations, and the financial analysis of the company, with no information regarding its competitors. Hence, this strategy did not work out either.
From our research, we can conclude that the primary reason for the information to be missing is the fact that not many players are as diverse as Kimberly in their product offerings, due to which it has a clear competitive advantage and no true competitors, although it does have many close competitors.