Case Studies - Failed Hotel Upgrade Companies

Part
01
of one
Part
01

Case Studies - Failed Hotel Upgrade Companies

HotelQuickly collapsed after suppliers started to cancel bookings made by the company due to massive unpaid debts. Super Break and LateRoom went under with their parent company, Malvern, after solvency issues.

1. HotelQuickly

  • HotelQuickly was a startup founded in 2012, that offered customers discounted hotel booking rates and last-minute bookings.
  • The company evolved fast, had a team of over 100 employees, aiming to bring mobile-first, last-minute hotel bookings. The app was downloaded more than 3 million times and the company had exclusive partnerships with more than 5,000 hotels and listed more than 200,000 properties through resale agreements.
  • In 2016, the company acquired Tonight Japan by an undisclosed amount, hoping to tap into the Japanese market.

1.1. Why the company failed

  • By 2017, the company was already about to hit $100 million in annualized transactions, however, challenges were pilling up. According to Tomas Laboutka, the co-founder, the price of customer acquisition was beyond a sustainable level.
  • He stated that “a growth-at-any-cost mindset could be attributed partly to the increasingly pronounced oligopoly of the two global travel players. But, the landscape also changed with the ever-rising dominance of Facebook and Google and the evaporating impact cheaper ad networks could offer.”
  • Other issues the company faced was lack of penetration of mobile payment services at the time and the difficulties surrounding the multi-country strategy. To handle all those challenges, the founders searched for a buyer who could provide the capital to leverage the company. They found Rising Sun Merchant Services, who bought the company and the founders departed.
  • According to Laboutka, “On August 2017, we decided to sell with a shared vision and promise of synergies across other travel portfolio companies as well as of additional technological expertise.” But the partnership didn’t go as planned.
  • In 2018, Rising Sun Merchant allowed HotelQuickly to run a debt of approximately $12 million with Hotelbeds, a wholesale supplier of many of its rooms. By November 2018, Hotelbeds began to cancel the company’s bookings and other suppliers followed suit.
  • A Hotelbeds spokesperson stated that “We help our travel buying partners source hotels through our technology platform and HotelQuickly was working with many similar providers. As is standard across the industry, the travel agent or OTA [online travel agency] acquiring the booking is always responsible for all aspects of the reservation, not the least responsibility for settling the hotel bill. Sadly, if they fail to do this, cancellations will follow and this is what many other wholesalers were forced to do in this case.”

1.2. Breaking point

  • On December 2018, customers began to receive emails canceling their reservations, with the company claiming problems with a supplier but not offering further explanations. The clients were also denied refunds and only received irredeemable vouchers as compensation.
  • Trivago and TripAdvisor removed the company from their websites and advised customers to dispute the payments. The site is no longer available.

2. Malvern Group

  • The parent company of both Super Break and LateRoom went into administration in August 2019 due to solvency issues.

2.1. Why the company failed

  • Malvern group faced solvency issues after Cox & Kings Ltd (India), an Indian tour operator, who owned 49% of the company, defaulted on a loan in July 2019, leading to a downgrade by credit agencies. The company tried and failed to secure funding or a buyer for the stake owned by Cox and Kings, who've fallen behind on $100 million in debt payments.
  • Cox & Kings India stated that "working capital situation at Cox & Kings stretched in the last few months and was further impacted due to its inability to replace the short-term loans with long-term loans and regular working capital line.
  • The fast collapse of Malvern and the fact that it placed itself up to the market after the company defaulted on its IATA billing and settlement plan (BSP) in June indicated a lack of cash flow option in the business and left many wondering what caused the failure to happen so quickly.
  • Fillings from November 2018 showed Malvern reporting a pre-tax loss of £2.3 million and said that it was embarking on a “strategic change program to position itself as the UK’s leading B2B travel technology provider”.
  • The company also acknowledged that Super Break and LateRooms had suffered from a difficult trading environment that was aggravated by the “increased cost of acquiring website traffic and the 2017 terrorist attacks in London.”
  • The Global Data’s head of research for travel and tourism, Nick Wyatt, stated that smaller players such as Super Break and LateRooms are struggling to compete with the marketing budgets of online travel agencies such as Expedia and Booking.

2.2 Breaking Point

  • According to the Financial Times, a source familiar with the sale process said that although there had been “a healthy interest” in the businesses, the timescale in which a deal needed to be finalized was too tight to prevent collapse.
  • KPMG has been appointed an administrator to the companies after the collapse in August 2019. The management team recently appointed advisors from KPMG to undertake an accelerated sales process to ensure further investment and have engaged with our principal bankers to secure interim funding.

2.3. Super Break

  • Established in 1983, Super Break was specialized in short city breaks in the UK and overseas and employed about 250 people. The company was part of the Malvern Group.
  • When Malvern went into administration, Super Break stopped trading in August 2019. Since Super Break was an Abta travel agency, refunds were guaranteed for most of its customers.
  • After the collapse, Super Break founder, Gordon Miller, expressed his wishes to relaunch a “stripped-down” version of the company that would sell fully bounded hotel-only bookings. He said “I’m interested in a stripped-down version of Super Break — so nothing overseas. Because we can’t compete and the margins aren’t high enough. This would be back to basics. A controlled operation, well-financed, UK-only, and sold through the trade.”
  • He later withdrew from the bidding process, citing that We just couldn’t get comfortable in making a bid on the basis of what we have been told. We had a real wish to turn the business around and make it what it should be".

2.4. LateRoom

  • Born in Manchester in 1999, LateRoom was an online accommodation site specialized in late stays for leisure and business.
  • LateRooms, also a part of the Malvern Group (after being previously owned by TUI and Cox & Kings), was not an Abta listed agency. That is, it could not receive payment from customers for their bookings, acting only as an agent.

RESEARCH STRATEGY

To provide a more robust analysis about the failure of HotelQuickly, LateRooms, and Super Break, we commenced our research by examining a multitude of news articles and industry-related sites, hoping to find the information that was missing from the previous researches. Although we could find several sources about the topic, most of them focused on the repercussions for customers or site aggregators.

We also searched for case studies, opinion pieces, and analysis but most of what found led us to the same point. From there, we looked for legal repercussions for the three cases, hoping that court documents and legal explanation could provide us with further details about the situation, especially about HotelQuickly. Unfortunately, probably due to the recency of the cases, we were unable to find enough information. We knew that there are some consumers seeking legal action and a possible class action suit against HotelQuickly but there is no publicly available information about proceedings.

Next, we looked for interviews and statements from people involved with the companies to gather enough statements to ensure an inside analysis of what happened. We only found some statements from HotelQuickly co-founder which was used to highlight some insights about the case. Nevertheless, people involved are remaining silence, apart from the standard press releases.
Another issue we faced was with the exact service provided by the companies, especially upgrade features. Since their websites and offerings are no longer available, we could not find reliable information about what they are offering recently regarding room upgrades. It was also not possible to break LateRooms and Super Breaks into two separate analysis, due to lack of information about previous struggles and the fact that both companies went under with their parent company, Malvern Group. Again, due to the recency of the case, further inside details are not publicly available. From what we could gather from the Super Break founder because the companies are in the process of being sold, most of the details about their issues are being kept under wraps. There are also some unanswered questions regarding how fast the company collapsed after Cox & Kings stopped the fundings that are yet to be answered.

Considering this was not the first research on the said subject, we chose to refrain from extensively repeating information that was already provided in previous researches. Also, there seems to be a common factor in these cases — marketing budgets and competitors. Laboutka stated that the cost for marketing, in order to compete, was beyond sustainable and Wyatt stated something similar. Analyzing other companies in a similar situation such as NighStay, HotHotels, LastRoom, and others, all starting at similar points, early 2010 – 2014, seems to point out similar circumstances. For example, Joseu Gio, co-founder of LastRoom stated that “So the tech is irrelevant given the importance of marketing and without funding, it is hard to do marketing”.

The mentality surrounding the growth of the companies could also be a possible reason behind the failures. With Laboutka speaking about the “growth-at-any-cost” mindset and Miller expressing his wishes to “strip-down” Super Break, competing with giants such as Expedia Group (which owns Expedia, Hotels.com, Travelocity, Orbitz, Trivago and Hotwire) and Booking Holdings (which owns Priceline, Kayak and Booking.com) also seems to be a common factor, along with investors not keeping up with the deals.

Did this report spark your curiosity?

Sources
Sources